Town Officials Estimate Avon Could Lose $3 Million With Car Tax Change

Gov. Malloy proposes exempting 90 percent of vehicles from property tax but local officials say that will mean making up the difference in real estate and personal property taxes.

In presenting his two-year budget proposal, Gov. Dannel Malloy said that, “we have no desire to shift the burden to our towns and cities. This budget holds them harmless.”

Indeed, even though Malloy stripped municipalities of several traditional grants, he made up the difference with a new grant, calling it the “Hold Harmless Grant.”

But Avon officials say the town could lose as much as $3 million should Malloy’s plan to do away with one of their largest sources of revenue – the car tax – take effect.

Avon Assistant Town Manager Steve Bartha said that the proposal would eliminate car taxes for anyone with vehicles that have an assessed value of less than $20,000, or under $28,500 in market value. Cars with a higher value would still be taxed.

“It’s a proposal he’s making and calling it middle class tax relief," Bartha said.

In the current fiscal year, Bartha said the car tax is "a ballpark $4.5 million revenue stream for the town.” He said Town Assessor Harry DerAsadourian estimated that car tax revenue in Avon could shrink to about $1.5 million if the governor's proposal passes.

“Roughly two-thirds of the revenue (from motor vehicle taxes) could go away,” Bartha said.

That means "property" and "real estate" "would have to absorb the $3 million" if the proposal is passed, shifting more burden onto those two categories to make up for the gap.

“If this proposal were to survive you would probably see the mill rate increase, but the impact would vary from home to home," Bartha said.

In his address, Malloy proposed exempting more than 90 percent of vehicles from the tax, which the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities estimates raises more than $560 million for Connecticut communities. He called the plan tax relief for middle class and poor families.

Towns would have the option of phasing in the exemption in 2013 but would have to forfeit it in July 2014.

Local officials see a number of problems resulting from the loss. 

“To make up revenue you need to cut certain services or raise taxes on real estate,” summarized state Rep. Brian Becker (D-19), who represents Avon, Farmington and West Hartford.

In Farmington, Town Council Chairman Jeff Hogan said he was “shocked and appalled” when he read the governor’s budget and that cutting the car tax was amounted to an attack on those cities and towns that had been worked hard to be financially responsible and maintain low mill rates.

“I feel … that the loss of PILOT and the loss of the car tax to Farmington specifically would be devastating. On the car tax — why? We run a great town here. We’ve done it right. … Farmington has been governed well for many, many years and we’re being punished,” he said. “It’s ludicrous that we should raise taxes on our residents to finance the ills of the state.”

Farmington Town Councilor John Vibert had another concern: leaving the majority of residents with no tax responsibility to keep them invested in local government. 

“As far as I can tell this will just shift the tax burden from car owners to property owners. In most cases that will remove all property tax burden from renters in town and disconnect people from town government,” Vibert said.

Though the inevitable increase in real estate taxes might be passed along to renters in the form of higher rent, Vibert worried that renters wouldn’t associate that with supporting town government.

“Nobody likes the taxes but it provides them a feeling that …’my kids go to school here. I pay taxes and support this,’” he said.

Malloy’s rationale for removing the tax was that it’s “unfair” because “residents in different communities pay very different amounts on the same property value.”

Sen. Beth Bye (D-West Hartford) said Malloy is just trying to keep “the balls in the air while waiting and hoping for the economy to come back.”

But she didn't back the plan.

"When you sit down and talk to residents, its one of the most unpopular taxes. So [eliminating the car tax] is a popular thing to do and that’s why governors propose it... you can say it’s unfair but mostly the governor is looking for a way to provide relief... I do think it takes one of the very few ways communities have to raise revenue away from them, so unless you replace that with something else, you've given them a difficult task," Bye said.

She advised that Malloy’s budget will be subject to a public comment period when residents and officials may voice concerns. Public hearings and bills are listed on the www.cga.ct.gov. Budget information will be listed under Appropriations.

Elizabeth February 15, 2013 at 04:28 PM
So, we're penalized if our cars are worth more? I must say, I'm so not shocked by this. This is the whole idea behind Obamacare (those who can pay for health insurance, pay for all). This is unfortunately, the direction that our democratic national and state leadership are pushing. We elected these guys (well, I didn't).
Liz Lukas February 16, 2013 at 03:26 PM
Which way do you want it Elizabeth - pay more for your own health insurance when coverage is not mandated (because you are paying for the care of the uninsured) or participate in health insurance where costs are spread over a wide swath of the population, reducing the pressure on costs and your premiums? The analogy to the car tax proposal is not apt. Actually, it's much more like the pre-Obamacare situation - where only some pay a cost in the form of car tax and yet services will be enjoyed by all. If you were in favor of the pre-Obamacare situation, you should actually be in favor of the car tax approach, if you want to be consistent.
rudy trudy February 19, 2013 at 10:06 PM
liz: obamacare wants everyone to buy insurance. youa re as ignorant as your republican leader
rudy trudy February 19, 2013 at 10:07 PM
well said
Adam February 22, 2013 at 02:38 AM
Providing tax relief is about dead last on the to-do list of any politician in this State. This is a proposal that never had any real chance. The only thing politicians here know is to coerce an already weary Connecticut taxpayer to endure even more misery by offering favors to special interests, paying lip service to the needs of the less fortunate (i.e. the unemployed), casting everything in class warfare (us v. them) terms, solipsistic reasoning and appealing to the fears of upper middle class, liberal, white women.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »